Driessen’s
article states many reasons why it is unfair for developing countries to be
held responsible for making efforts to mitigate climate change. He believes
that they are not in an economic position to be able to think about
environmental problems, and that developed countries are ignoring their needs
and problems by expecting them to make efforts towards becoming environmentally
friendly. However, developing countries are only hurting themselves by
continuing to pollute and contribute to climate change. By continuing with
their current lifestyle, they are only exacerbating their problems and making
them more difficult to overcome.
Driessen
seems to expect developing countries to get a free pass for dealing with
climate change due to the other problems they are facing such as disease,
malnutrition, and poverty. However climate change is a global problem that
cannot be solved with only developed countries. Regardless of what countries
contributed the most to climate change in the past, the entire world will be
forced to deal with the consequences without international efforts. It is unfair
that the rest of the world, and future generations will have to deal with the
harsh effects of climate change if developing countries choose to not lower
their emissions.
A
common argument for why developing countries should not have to make mitigation
efforts is that developed countries were able to burn fossil fuels without
limits in order to create a strong economy. However this is before the majority
of information regarding climate change was released. Had developed countries
known then the harsh consequences of burning fossil fuels, they would have been
expected to curb their emissions. With current technology and knowledge that is
known regarding climate change, it is fair to expect developing countries to do
their part to lower greenhouse gases.
By
expecting developing countries to lower their emissions, developed countries are
by no means ignoring the interests of the global south. Many of the affects of
climate change will hit developing countries the hardest. Higher temperatures
will reduce the growing periods for crops, hurting crop production. Lower crop
yields will cause disrupted incomes, both of which could increase world hunger.
Many diseases such as malnutrition, malaria, and dengue are climate sensitive
and increased temperatures will only increase cases of these diseases. Because
of these problems climate change could cause, it is certainly in the best
interest of developing countries to lower their greenhouse gases. It will
become impossible for them to overcome their other problems with the risks
posed by climate change.
Perhaps
environmentalists are leaning towards the precautionary side when dealing with
climate change. However due to the complexity of the problems climate change
could cause, taking preventative measures is more than necessary. The longer
the world waits to see the full effects of climate change, it will be too late
reverse the effects. The consequences are not only very long term, but will be
very difficult to handle, and will eventually effect the quality of life among
many. When dealing with problems this big, taking precautionary measure is necessary
and is by no means limiting growth.
The
author also disagrees with the term sustainable development, and he believes
that it is impossible to achieve under such a rapidly growing population. The
author should think about sustainable development not as limiting growth, but
as smart growth. Developing countries can still grow, but it needs to be done
in a way that considers future generations and their needs. It would be unfair
to leave them with our huge mess to clean up, and force them into a lower
quality of life.
Overall, Driessen does not seem to
think about the future or the problems they will face if nothing is done to
mitigate climate change now. The potential problems climate change could cause
are not something the world should risk. Even if lowering greenhouse gas
emissions and requiring developing countries to do the same is taking a
precautionary measure, avoiding the potential large scale problems that could
occur is certainly in everyone’s best interest.
Another possible critique of Driessen is whether or not his preferred policies really will being about the goals that he thinks they will? Who do they really benefit?
ReplyDeleteDo you think that since the North historically is responsible for the current climate problems they should be responsible for providing the technology and funds to developing countries to grow in a smart way? Especially since developing countries have other prominent issues to take care of already.
ReplyDeleteI was wondering if you think the effects of climate change will only lead to increased instances of poverty, disease and malnutrition in developing countries? If so, it could be that by working to prevent further effects of climate change now, developing countries could also be preventing their current problems from becoming worse.
ReplyDeleteIn my Social Demography course, I remember discussing how increased economic and social development in Europe and the United States was attributed in part to improved public health and the reduction of disease and malnutrition. This leads me to believe that if climate change prevention could help developing countries prevent increased cases of disease and malnutrition, that these efforts could eventually help them meet their development objectives.