International treaties mixed with technological
advances are the future of solving some of the planet’s gravest environmental
problems. The Montreal Protocol, eventually ratified by 197 States, is a prime
example of the combination of cooperation and innovation that is needed to solve
a worldwide environmental issue. Many people believe that the key to solving
these problems is having the technology to do so.
The
Montreal Protocol should be a guideline for future treaties. It took an
environmental problem and found the appropriate and effective technology to
quickly and efficiently solve it. The treaty is also effective because it took
into consideration the need to make revisions in order to get more ratifiers.
The treaty is sometimes known as a “universally ratified treaty,” which in
terms of environmental problems is a great success and the answer to future
problems.
A
debatable topic involved with the Montreal Protocol is the use of technology as
a means for being the overall savior to the increasing size of the ozone hole. The
Protocol may have been successful, but there is no question that the
development of a replacement for chlorofluorocarbons known as HFC’s was what
advanced the protocol to a universal success. The treaty was designed to phase
out chlorofluorocarbons, but with most of the use happening in developed
countries, the push for a substitute became a priority. It is clear that combination
of factors needs to be in place to ensure a successful treaty, but in reality
there have been little to no extremely successful ones other than the Montreal Protocol.
One
of the biggest topics in the environmental world is that technology will be the
answer to all of our problems. The planet continues to support more humans and
continues to ignore some of the biggest issues facing environmental
destruction. International environmental concern is usually done in broad
terms, such as ozone depletion, climate change, desertification etc. The key to
environmental treaties being successful is to focus on the smaller problems
which lead to the bigger ones. Technology will inevitably assist in these
localized problems.
A
prime example could be the increase in acid rain causing destruction to the
world’s aquatic ecosystems. This would once again focus first and foremost on
the developed nations, who produce most of the air pollution contributing to
acid rain. A treaty following similar guidelines of the Montreal Protocol would
encourage phases to reduce emissions (which have occurred in many countries)
and continue to be revised as goals are met. The next step would incorporate
the use of new technologies, which could be in the form of alternative energies
or more efficient pollution catching devices. If there was technology that was
an easy replacement for the countries to adopt, as was with Montreal, the
problem known as acid rain would diminish quickly and efficiently. The ease and
success of a treaty due to technological advances would make any State look
foolish for not ratifying. Once the leading states followed the treaties, there
would be no reason for it not to become another universal success amongst international
treaties.
Although,
many humans consider technology to be the planet’s saving grace and the term
ecological modernism is on the rise. There are disbelievers to every great
idea. These environmentalists believe that technology and international
cooperation alone will not be the answer to the greatest environmental
problems, but only prolong the time we have before the greatest effects take
place. Many conservationists believe this approach is not environmentally
friendly at all, but a means for making human life more comfortable while
covering up the truths. These environmentalists believe technology might even
make matters worse, a good example is crop yielding. Technology allows us to
grow and harvest more and more agriculture, which seems good until you
incorporate all of the additional stressors it adds to the environment.
International
treaties will always be a tricky means of solving environmental problems, but
the addition of technology has proven to be a very successful factor of solving problems on global scale. Although there is doubt, evidence of the Montreal
Protocol shows that universal agreement and quick results are possible with the
right factors and revisions to an international treaty. Technology is always
changing and these changes will hopefully increase the likelihood of another
universal agreement amongst the states of the world. Environmental problems
happen on a global level and need to be taken into consideration before it’s
too late.
You phrase your post as 'international treaties', are there treaties or even environmental problems where technology solutions make little sense?
ReplyDeleteOne environmental problem that comes to mind immediately is the use of pesticides to increase the quantity and quality of crops grown. The increasing population on the planet puts extreme pressure on the people to grow more food, which therefore places more pressure on the land. Technology has been the answer so far to increase farming and reduce attacks from insects or fungi on the plants. I believe that farmers should take to older farming practices, which worked for many centuries but to do it in a precise scientific way. This is known in modern society as organic farming. There are skeptics, but there are also supporters. Furthermore, I think this is one of the problems in society that we face where technology can only help for so long.
ReplyDeleteThis blog post is similar to mine in that it discusses whether replacement technology is necessary to solve environmental problems. I see your point that it may be a backwards way of approaching environmental problems. Although replacement technology is a great and easy way to solve these problems, it gives people the mentality that a new technology will always eventually come along to reverse their actions. Awareness of one's actions and a change in lifestyle is more effective in the long run as it may become necessary at some point. There may come a time when a problem cannot be solved with replacement technology, but people will be so used to their lavish lifestyle and will refuse to make any changes.
ReplyDeleteResponding to Professor Shirk's question on environmental treaties/problems that make little sense: yes, there are some. One example I can think of is the issue of deforestation. The destruction of trees for development or resources is not not necessarily solved by better technology. One could argue that improved technology could lead to humans not needing more land for development or not needing resources from trees. These solutions are on the peripherally though - the main task is stoping the practice at all.
ReplyDeleteI agree with Alex. I think that as environmentalists, we need to be focused primarily on conserving what we have left. Using new technologies I believe will only lead to further destruction of the environment and usage of the land.
ReplyDelete